<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do you use the META keywords tag?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lyndseo.com/2010/07/do-you-use-the-meta-keywords-tag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lyndseo.com/2010/07/do-you-use-the-meta-keywords-tag/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:42:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topher Kohan</title>
		<link>http://www.lyndseo.com/2010/07/do-you-use-the-meta-keywords-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Topher Kohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lyndseo.com/?p=478#comment-283</guid>
		<description>Yes I use ut because a lot of on site search applications still use the meta keywords to return results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I use ut because a lot of on site search applications still use the meta keywords to return results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Polk</title>
		<link>http://www.lyndseo.com/2010/07/do-you-use-the-meta-keywords-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Polk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lyndseo.com/?p=478#comment-276</guid>
		<description>Yes - I still use them, but automate the population - you never know what the engines may or may not revert back to. Not to mention it simply is a way to audit/task pages with keywords.

As far as saving space for more body copy to be spidered ... highly doubtful that would be an issue in any major search engine. I have pages that have over 3500 words of indexed content on them ... no issues there.

I do not believe you will be hurting yourself in the rankings by not using them, but I look items like this as &quot;tie breakers&quot; - all other things being even, this &quot;may&quot; help you - I say sweat the small stuff (but automate it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8211; I still use them, but automate the population &#8211; you never know what the engines may or may not revert back to. Not to mention it simply is a way to audit/task pages with keywords.</p>
<p>As far as saving space for more body copy to be spidered &#8230; highly doubtful that would be an issue in any major search engine. I have pages that have over 3500 words of indexed content on them &#8230; no issues there.</p>
<p>I do not believe you will be hurting yourself in the rankings by not using them, but I look items like this as &#8220;tie breakers&#8221; &#8211; all other things being even, this &#8220;may&#8221; help you &#8211; I say sweat the small stuff (but automate it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alysson</title>
		<link>http://www.lyndseo.com/2010/07/do-you-use-the-meta-keywords-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Alysson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lyndseo.com/?p=478#comment-274</guid>
		<description>Because some bookmarking services automatically populate titles, descriptions and keywords fields with the META information, I still use them.  It takes only a few seconds to paste the target terms from a keyword map document into the META tag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because some bookmarking services automatically populate titles, descriptions and keywords fields with the META information, I still use them.  It takes only a few seconds to paste the target terms from a keyword map document into the META tag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.lyndseo.com/2010/07/do-you-use-the-meta-keywords-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lyndseo.com/?p=478#comment-273</guid>
		<description>Lyndsay, long time no see; maybe at pubcon again this year. 

If a new client has been trying to stuff their meta with keywords, I just delete everything except the single keyword phrase I am trying to rank for.  I use it just in case antiquated search engines still look at it.  I haven&#039;t noticed any negative affect in Google unless a client is keyword stuffing.  If all you care about is Google and you are starting from scratch, I would skip it; keep that load time down to a minimum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lyndsay, long time no see; maybe at pubcon again this year. </p>
<p>If a new client has been trying to stuff their meta with keywords, I just delete everything except the single keyword phrase I am trying to rank for.  I use it just in case antiquated search engines still look at it.  I haven&#8217;t noticed any negative affect in Google unless a client is keyword stuffing.  If all you care about is Google and you are starting from scratch, I would skip it; keep that load time down to a minimum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Thyfault</title>
		<link>http://www.lyndseo.com/2010/07/do-you-use-the-meta-keywords-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>John Thyfault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lyndseo.com/?p=478#comment-272</guid>
		<description>We used to use it as a documentation tool.  It was never really effective for anything else.

We have backed out this year as part of our incremental page speed improvement effort for our clients.  It is a small bit of bytes but every little byte counts. (feel free to groan over the alliteration)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We used to use it as a documentation tool.  It was never really effective for anything else.</p>
<p>We have backed out this year as part of our incremental page speed improvement effort for our clients.  It is a small bit of bytes but every little byte counts. (feel free to groan over the alliteration)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyndsay Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.lyndseo.com/2010/07/do-you-use-the-meta-keywords-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyndsay Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lyndseo.com/?p=478#comment-270</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-267&quot;&gt;@Jack Leblond &lt;/a&gt; 
That&#039;s actually what drove me to ask the question. I don&#039;t even want to spend a minute on it when I can use those 60 seconds for something more productive (which, in this case, appears to have been creating a poll).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-267">@Jack Leblond </a><br />
That&#8217;s actually what drove me to ask the question. I don&#8217;t even want to spend a minute on it when I can use those 60 seconds for something more productive (which, in this case, appears to have been creating a poll).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyndsay Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.lyndseo.com/2010/07/do-you-use-the-meta-keywords-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyndsay Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lyndseo.com/?p=478#comment-269</guid>
		<description>That was my thought too Steve!  So you could argue that it actually hinders ranking. Slightly.  But by a lot more if you&#039;ve shoved hundreds of keywords in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was my thought too Steve!  So you could argue that it actually hinders ranking. Slightly.  But by a lot more if you&#8217;ve shoved hundreds of keywords in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveplunkett</title>
		<link>http://www.lyndseo.com/2010/07/do-you-use-the-meta-keywords-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>steveplunkett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lyndseo.com/?p=478#comment-268</guid>
		<description>I actually started removing it to allow more characters of the body copy to be spidered. 
it&#039;s not a factor in search rankings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually started removing it to allow more characters of the body copy to be spidered.<br />
it&#8217;s not a factor in search rankings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Leblond</title>
		<link>http://www.lyndseo.com/2010/07/do-you-use-the-meta-keywords-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Leblond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lyndseo.com/?p=478#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Use - yes...a lot of effort - no.  If they provide even a small clue to content *somehow*- great, if not - well, I&#039;m only out a minute of my time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use &#8211; yes&#8230;a lot of effort &#8211; no.  If they provide even a small clue to content *somehow*- great, if not &#8211; well, I&#8217;m only out a minute of my time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

