Question: Did you show a precise figure in this week`s negotiations, sir? Can you share this issue? Question: After the conclusion of the negotiations today, the Department of Foreign Affairs issued a press release saying that both sides were broadening their understanding. And I wonder in what sense, to what extent and to what extent both parties are broadening their understanding. I have spent my entire career working with close allies and in strong alliances; I know from experience that we are getting stronger when we are with our allies like the Republic of Korea, so we take that very seriously when we conduct these negotiations. However, the two countries have still not agreed on a broader agreement on cost allocation, which has led workers to get their ass kicked. South Korea and the United States are embroered in a nearly two-year dispute over how much each must pay to support the approximately 28,500 U.S. troops stationed in South Korea, a legacy of the 1950-53 Korean War, which ended with a ceasefire, not a peace treaty. DeHart: Well, and as I said, we are focusing differently at this stage of the negotiations. But it is about reaching an agreement that better reflects the total cost of the Republic of Korea`s defence to the United States. Because if you look at the direct costs that our forces have here, in terms of work, construction, logistics, defending Korea is a relatively small part of what it costs as a whole. And that cost is rising rapidly.
With technology, the skills we offer today are evolving, and they are very different. And so the costs are much, much greater if you look at the choices of the force structure and all the activities and investments that we need to make to be able to react in times of crisis to defend the Republic of Korea. So we tried to understand it in our proposals, and we discussed it at length. But that was really the genesis of that â€” if we look at our defence of Korea in a broad context. “In the absence of a signed ADM or a related bilateral agreement, the USFK can be … Korean national employees will not begin until April 1. President Donald Trump has said that South Korea should pay more, and differences of opinion have raised the prospect that it may at least withdraw some American troops, as he has done elsewhere. The ROK`s position is well received by the local public, but almost a non-departure for “real” negotiations.
The confusing presentation of their position in the United States is equally problematic. In December 2019, in Seoul, the chief U.S. negotiator said publicly, “As parties to the agreement, we can amend the agreement if we agree to do it together. This is why the SMA agreement has been updated and modified over the years. This statement, together with the United States